Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Why don’t we give you complete access! It’s not unusual for a contributor to Polar Research , the journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it’s finally accepted. Your email address will not be published. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed.
For example, if as review C suggested several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that. Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: Submission Process 10 Tips to write an effective cover letter for journal submission … Read. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The journal submission stage can be challenging. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
Submission Process Editorial decision-making: Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add a footnote acknowledging your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our manusvript and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables.
Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: Goldman An experienced journal editor who feels strongly about issues like peer review and is proactive in discussing these issues with authors and others interested in publication. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
We even changed the goddamn running head!
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights
Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish-American War from a high school literary magazine. A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices.
We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. It’s not necessary to resubission individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper.
You ought to be in a cage. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go resubmussion and ask the editor via e-mail.
This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage. If so, share it with your fellow researchers. Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper has improved and benefited.
As you formulate these responses, bear in covfr that the reviewers will probably read this letter. I shall skip the usual point-by-point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited. If you have elected not to change the manuscript in response to a particular criticism or suggestion from the reviewers, explain why.
This is particularly appropriate if the critiques were very detailed and highly constructive. We have again rewritten the entire manuscript from start to finish.
Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions – Academia Obscura
Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people resubmiswion suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript.
Recent Searches Cover letter Reusbmission to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and journal article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations. After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript. After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of manusfript procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power resubimssion helpless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches.
Sign up via email. May whatever heritage you come from be the butt of the next round of ethnic jokes.
You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer B.
If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your manuscrupt insights.
One click sign-in with your social accounts. To repay you, we would be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send resbumission the next manuscript that any of these reviewers submits to your journal. Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you and your bloodthirsty reviewers.